Are we really that desperate that this looks good?
I understand that we have to start without a lot of specifics, but this proposal seems even less than that. It's not just the specifics that are lacking, there is nothing tying the parts together. It reads like someone worked through a check list but had no idea how to make it into a coherent whole. We already know how it's supposed to work, but someone with no knowledge of how a trail system gets built would not be enlightened by reading this proposal.
If I was in a county or local government position and this proposal landed on my desk, I would question the judgement of the people who were presumably making their best effort. IMO, it would be better to pass for a while than embarrass ourselves with something done this badly.
Sorry, I can't go along with the consensus on this one.
Walt